Defend University is a research and development group dedicated to the exploration of leading edge techniques and strategies for
self-defense, security and defensive tactics.  Look here for info that can be applied to your personal protection, defensive tactics, executive protection, and martial arts programs.
 
Defend University Phoenix Defend University New York Defend University Ireland
 
Home
Articles
"Self-Defense Sense" blog
Newsletter Archives
Self-Defense Questions Answered
Links
Defend U. Bookstore for shirts and gifts
Contact Us

 

Q: [In the Hockey Dad fight,] the media would have you believe that they were two upstanding guys who just had a fight and one went too far. Junta was apparently not the aggressor, he was hit first. He defended himself, he lost his temper, and did more than was absolutely necessary. Costen picked on the wrong guy and he paid a heavy price, but he started the fight. Junta should not go to prison for defending himself. The fight was forced on Junta according to the witnesses.

A: It looks to me like Costin basically started it (twice) and I agree with you, someone should not go to prison for defending themselves.

BUT, when Junta had Costin in a position that he could no longer defend himself (sometimes you will see this referred to as having the opponent "in chancery", meaning an inescapable position) then Junta could have and should have let off. I think the fact that he had Costin mounted, struck him repeatedly and took two hands and smashed Costin's head into the ground led to the charges. Plus, when someone dies -- you are going to jail.

Here's a weird case for you -- a cop is in a bar (off duty) and three punks recognize him from an earlier arrest. They trade verbal barbs back and forth.

A fistfight breaks out and the cop finds himself on the floor getting the boots from all three punks. He draws his firearm from his ankle holster and -- from the floor -- shoots all three of the attackers.

Cop was guilty of one count of manslaughter. Because of the disparity of force (3 on 1) the cop was justified in using deadly force UNTIL there was only one attacker left. The court felt that then it was 1 on 1 and therefore a "fair" fight. When the cop shot the last guy, it was manslaughter.

In the Junta case, the medical examiner said there were at least 15 areas of trauma on the deceased.

The jury admitted it was a case of mutual combat, but what swung the jury was Junta's general out of control fury (pushing his way back into the arena with such force that it left a bruise on the female manager's arm) AND that Junta had the opportunity to stop the beating when the deceased could no longer resist -- especially when people were screaming "YOU'RE KILLING HIM".

A couple of points here:

1. When you are mounted, to witnesses YOU are the aggressor;
2. You should train to include some submissions or immobilization techniques in your arsenal;
3. Juries tend to frown on battering someone with your fists repeatedly in the head area when they cannot respond.


It is not uncommon for people to die after they've been punched. (Most of the times it's when you punch someone and, in their drunken stupor, they fall over and crack their head on the pavement). In these cases, the aggressor almost always is found guilty of manslaughter.

Something to think about if your techniques consists only of striking.